| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | krah(dot)tm(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: running ANALYZE results in => duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_statistic_relid_att_inh_index" |
| Date: | 2023-09-06 09:56:15 |
| Message-ID: | efd746b47ab0ac43c432c8f79383e4b1237f586e.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 10:33 +0200, Torsten Krah wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 06.09.2023 um 10:21 +0200 schrieb Laurenz Albe:
> > You are lucky that the corrupted table is one that holds data that
> > can be rebuilt.
>
> It is a test instance / container anyway which is deleted afterwards
> and can be setup again as often as I want.
>
> But how is that corruption happening - I mean it is a docker image,
> freshly fetched from the registry.
>
> After that I am starting a container from that image, (re)importing
> data (different tests => different data so the cycle of delete data /
> import data / analyze the data happens quite often) and running my
> tests.
> The OS does not report anything which would relate nor does any other
> tool / system fail nor does postgresl itself fail on any other table
> here - it always fails only on that analyze part.
>
> That happens all in about 8-10 minutes for the whole process - what is
> causing that corruption in that short timeframe here?
If you have a reproducible way to create the data corruption, that would
be very interesting. It micht be a software bug.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Wienhold | 2023-09-06 10:04:50 | Re: running ANALYZE results in => duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_statistic_relid_att_inh_index" |
| Previous Message | Torsten Krah | 2023-09-06 08:33:31 | Re: running ANALYZE results in => duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_statistic_relid_att_inh_index" |