| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Date: | 2018-08-16 12:28:25 |
| Message-ID: | ef986aa7-c7ca-ec34-19d9-fef38716b109@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 16/08/2018 01:06, Andres Freund wrote:
> So it looks like msvc 2013 might be the relevant requirement.
According to my research (completely untested in practice), you need
2010 for mixed code and declarations and 2013 for named initialization
of structs.
I wonder what raising the msvc requirement would imply for supporting
older Windows versions.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-16 12:30:50 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-16 12:26:07 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-16 12:30:50 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-16 12:26:07 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |