From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Bychik <kirill(dot)bychik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
Date: | 2020-04-06 15:01:30 |
Message-ID: | ef8c966f-e50a-c583-7b1e-85de6f4ca0d3@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed in some of the screenshots that were tweeted that for example in
WAL: records=1 bytes=56
there are two spaces between pieces of data. This doesn't match the
rest of the EXPLAIN output. Can that be adjusted?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2020-04-06 15:04:37 | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-04-06 15:00:00 | BUG #16346: pg_upgrade fails on a trigger with a comment |