From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Rob Northcott <Rob(dot)Northcott(at)compilator(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Keep needing to run manual analyze |
Date: | 2021-01-07 02:06:01 |
Message-ID: | ef41e377a76f44c6844634f58e8157c04a727c1b.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 17:28 +0000, Rob Northcott wrote:
> We have an application that uses a Postgres database (currently 9.6). All the autovacuum/analyze settings are just left at the defaults.
> We’ve had a few instances recently where users have complained of slow performance and running a manual Analyze
> (not vacuum) on their database has resolved it.
> Should it be considered normal that this needs to be done manually periodically even when autovacuum is on?
> It’s not a very heavy application by a lot of people’s standards (it’s just a point-of-sale/stock-control system)
> but there are a couple of hundred databases on the server, all in fairly constant use through the day.
> Is it possible that the autovacuum/analyze isn’t running for some reason? If so, is there anything I
> should look at to make it work better or should I just be looking at scheduling a manual vacuum/analyze
> periodically on all databases?
That is not necessary.
You should figure out what tables need more frequent ANALYZE runs to get good execution plans
and tune autoanalyze for these tables, for example by reducing the scale factor for them.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-01-07 02:12:16 | Re: SQL to query running transactions with subtransactions that exceeds 64 |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2021-01-06 21:06:06 | Re: CROSSTAB( .. only one column has values... ) |