From: | Gnanavel S <s(dot)gnanavel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL overall design |
Date: | 2005-09-27 13:46:09 |
Message-ID: | eec3b03c050927064670e1625b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On 9/27/05, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
> [ -performance removed ]
>
> Gnanavel S wrote:
>
> >
> > Need a clarification in copydir.c file of src/port directory, In the
> > following snippet the destination directory is created first then the
> > source directory is read. Suppose if I don't have permission to read
> > the source, even then the destination directory would be created.
> > I just want to know whether there is any reason for doing so?
> >
> >
>
>
> Under what circumstances do you imagine this will happen, since the
> postmaster user owns all the files and directories?
Understood. But can you explain why it is done in that way as what I said
seems to be standard way of doing it (correct me if I'm wrong).
--
with regards,
S.Gnanavel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-09-27 13:46:30 | Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation |
Previous Message | Jonathan Beit-Aharon | 2005-09-27 13:35:04 | Re: Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-27 14:12:08 | Re: [PERFORM] PostgreSQL overall design |
Previous Message | Gnanavel S | 2005-09-27 13:30:14 | Re: PostgreSQL overall design |