From: | Gnanavel S <s(dot)gnanavel(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: diary constraints |
Date: | 2005-08-23 09:00:10 |
Message-ID: | eec3b03c0508230200127dd262@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On 8/23/05, Gary Stainburn <gary(dot)stainburn(at)ringways(dot)co(dot)uk> wrote:
>
> Hi folks
>
> I know this has been discussed in the past, but no amount of keywords
> has returned anything from the archives.
>
> I want to create a courtesy car diary diary system where I have a table
> containing all of the cortesy cars in the pool, and then an allocation
> table which has two timestamps, one for the start date/time and one for
> the return date/time.
>
> How do I go about creating constraints on inserts and updates to ensure
> that
>
> a) the finish is after the start
check constraint like -> "finish_time > start_time" this will do
b) two allocations for a single vehicle don't overlap.
Use "overlaps" function in a trigger to validate the above.
--
> Gary Stainburn
>
> This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
> may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
> and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
with regards,
S.Gnanavel
Satyam Computer Services Ltd.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PFC | 2005-08-23 09:06:42 | Re: diary constraints |
Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2005-08-23 08:58:13 | Re: diary constraints |