From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... |
Date: | 2003-01-06 18:44:42 |
Message-ID: | ee7d463f429dc8b7ecbb53f901537c38@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>> The PHP site shows adds.
>
> And I just checked ... so does Sourceforge ...
Sourceforge is not a good example: they are not a organization of open
source people, but a a site owned by a company (OSDN, Inc.) which
in turn is owned by another company (VA Software Corporation).
I think it is better to compare to sites that are closer in spirit
and mission to us. None of these have banner ads:
www.apache.org
www.perl.org
www.sendmail.org (despite the commercial ties)
www.gnupg.org
www.opensource.org
www.gimp.org
www.gnome.org
If the banner ads (as previously stated) do not bring in much revenue,
is there a reason to keep them?
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200301061347
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE+GdDHvJuQZxSWSsgRAhuTAJ9WTsJnBIZfwrgFJ5wPm75OsZ+2twCeLGYX
7n1RRYGFkmRgLQDNEWcQdQo=
=RlGt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-06 18:48:41 | SQL_SIZING view |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-06 18:36:04 | Re: Upgrading rant. |