Re: documenting the backup manifest file format

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: documenting the backup manifest file format
Date: 2020-04-13 18:28:31
Message-ID: ee7c088c83572555a5827e3ccfda4ec5@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-04-13 20:08, Robert Haas wrote:
> [v2-0001-Document-the-backup-manifest-file-format.patch]

Can you double check this sentence? Seems strange to me but I don't
know why; it may well be that my english is not good enough. Maybe a
comma after 'required' makes reading easier?

The timeline from which this range of WAL records will be required in
order to make use of this backup. The value is an integer.

One typo:

'when making using' should be
'when making use'

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-13 18:47:27 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-13 18:27:03 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?