| From: | Niels Jespersen <NJN(at)dst(dot)dk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | SV: SV: Npgsql and the Connection Service File |
| Date: | 2021-02-04 05:03:57 |
| Message-ID: | ee56702f288445f1a36f4284e564dbad@dst.dk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Fra: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)postgres(dot)rocks>
>>> It would be nice if Npgsql (and jdbc and others) emulated the libpq behaviour.
>>> Because in my mind, abstracting hostname, portnumber and databasename
>>> away is a really useful feature.
>>>
>>> How do others manage this?
>>
>>Either they don't or they write their own class that does that.
>>
>>Perhaps you should contact Npgsql and suggest such a feature.
>>
>Yes, thank you.
>I did just that. It turns out there is already an existing pull request with exactly that feature. I hope for it to be included in a release soon.
>Regards Niels Jespersen
>
>Ya, I intend to push one in sooner than later.
>
>Dave
>
Thank you for that. Looking very much forward to it.
Niels
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sumit Raja | 2021-02-04 05:24:59 | pg_trgm for address search |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-02-04 03:29:35 | Re: Database upgrade Pg11 to Pg12 issues |