Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Date: 2025-02-26 14:30:49
Message-ID: edeb405c-b9f8-4e4b-aeee-e40e799be86f@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18.02.25 09:34, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 12:43, Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
>> Attached is a rebased patchset of my previous proposal, including a
>> few changes that Michael preferred:
>
> Rebased again. (got notified because of the new commitfest rebase emails)
>
> The first patch should be trivial to commit at least as it's just cleanup.

I think the additions to typedefs.list are useless. Since nothing
actually uses these types, the collection on the buildfarm won't find
any uses of them and thus won't include it in its list, and then the
next update from the buildfarm will overwrite your changes.

You might as well just remove the type definitions (but keep the enum
declarations).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2025-02-26 14:54:34 Re: Postmaster crashed during start
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2025-02-26 14:04:42 Script for determining code coverage of functions listed in pg_proc.dat