From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: automating perl compile time checking |
Date: | 2018-06-11 20:01:27 |
Message-ID: | ede81a1b-42f3-afbc-b29f-d70c05b355eb@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/11/18 15:38, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> On 5 Jun 2018, at 16:31, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> The patch contains a simple script to run the checks. The code that finds perl files is put in a function in a single file that is sourced by the three locations that need it.
>>> +1 on centralizing the find-files function.
>> +1 on that. Why do we need to make the new find_perl_files file
>> executable, given it's always sourced? (I would have given a .sh
>> extension because it's a lib not an executable, but I suppose that's
>> just matter of taste; we certainly don't have a policy about it).
>>
>> Looks fine to me either way.
>>
>
>
> I've committed this, but I'm fine if people want to tweak the names. It
> probably doesn't need to be executable.
Why is this being committed after feature freeze?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-11 20:06:14 | Re: automating perl compile time checking |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2018-06-11 19:38:57 | Re: automating perl compile time checking |