| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | rutuparna andhare <rsandhare(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Active-Passive DB |
| Date: | 2019-11-22 08:59:43 |
| Message-ID: | edc3e1707f4ec2501e4e55e57f10701f7ca5951e.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 14:25 +0530, rutuparna andhare wrote:
> In PG , can we have Active1 , Passive1 , Passive2 cluster.
> Now all active1 data is present in passive1 and 2.
> but when any delete query runs on active1 , same should get replicated on passive1 But delete should not get triggered on passive2.
>
> so passive2 can be used as archival db.
> if active1 fails then , passive1 will become active2.
You would need logical replication for passive2.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2019-11-22 09:07:04 | Re: Extract transactions from wals ?? |
| Previous Message | rutuparna andhare | 2019-11-22 08:55:59 | Active-Passive DB |