On 09/28/2017 09:19 AM, Maksim Milyutin wrote:
>> E.g. "No partition constraint" vs. "Partition constraint:
>> satisfies_hash_partition(...)".
>
> I also noticed ambiguity in printing "No partition constraint" in
> non-verbose mode and "Partition constraint:..." in verbose one for
> partition tables regardless of the type of partition.
> Attached small patch removes any output about partition constraint in
> non-verbose mode.
>
Yeah, that could be one way.
It should likely be backported to REL_10_STABLE, so the question is if
we are too late in the release cycle to change that output.
Best regards,
Jesper