| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? |
| Date: | 2023-01-18 10:36:18 |
| Message-ID: | ed11e858-12e9-2a9f-3091-d887a544f1a6@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11.01.23 07:11, Peter Smith wrote:
> v9-0003 --> v10-0001
>
>> I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something
>> pending, please post an updated patch for the same.
>
> Thanks for the reminder. PSA v10.
So this patch changes some sections describing system views to
refentry's. What is the reason for that? refentry's are basically man
pages; do we want man pages for each system view?
Maybe (*), but then we should also do the same to all the other system
views, all the system catalogs, everything else. Just changing a few in
a single place seems odd.
(*) -- but also maybe not?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2023-01-18 10:52:24 | Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates |
| Previous Message | Jelte Fennema | 2023-01-18 10:24:20 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Support load balancing in libpq |