| From: | "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Nolan" <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | M2Y <mailtoyahoo(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Oracle and Postgresql |
| Date: | 2008-09-02 21:21:12 |
| Message-ID: | ecd779860809021421r61b925feoe1588bde7b5dd98b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Oracle handles connecting to multiple databases (even on multiple/remote
> computers) fairly seamlessly, PG does not (yet.)
>
Stuff we do with plProxy on PostgreSQL is in some respects more advanced
than anything Oracle has to offer :) We have hundreds of databases in quite
complex network of remote calls and replication.
regards
Asko
> Oracle's toolsets (for things like forms and reports) are much further
> developed than PG's too, though there are 3rd party tools that work with
> both.
>
> Back in the old mainframe days, people used to say, "Nobody ever got fired
> for selecting IBM." It appears that mindset is still true.
> --
> Mike Nolan
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dennis Brakhane | 2008-09-02 21:24:43 | Re: How to create a case-insensitive unique constraint? |
| Previous Message | Roberts, Jon | 2008-09-02 21:20:21 | Re: Foreign Key normalization question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2008-09-02 23:04:45 | Re: categorizing mailing lists |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2008-09-02 17:36:17 | Re: categorizing mailing lists |