Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Date: 2023-02-08 15:42:33
Message-ID: ec9888f4-deae-9020-3165-6764a90bfc80@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.02.23 19:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3*is*
> supported in these branches. There could be an argument for
> not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is
> also supported there. On the whole though, it seems more useful
> today for that test to pass with 3.x than for it to pass with 0.9.8.

Ok, let's do it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-08 15:49:50 Re: [PATCH] Make ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING and ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE consistent
Previous Message Robert Haas 2023-02-08 15:22:24 Re: Weird failure with latches in curculio on v15