| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | libcub(at)hotmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Put cluster in the hierarchy in 22.1 |
| Date: | 2020-01-07 10:27:29 |
| Message-ID: | ec64fabf1c433bf482662cfa24b1c64ad8edbcf8.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 03:35 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/manage-ag-overview.html
> Description:
>
> 22.1 says "So the full hierarchy is: server, database, schema, table (or
> some other kind of object, such as a function)." Could "cluster" be added in
> there for completeness sake? "So the full hierarchy is: server, cluster,
> database, schema, table (or some other kind of object, such as a function)."
> It might be nice to have a graphic showing the relationships, adding other
> things as well: columns, constraints, triggers, etc.
"Server" and "cluster" are synonymous here.
Perhaps we should include "cluster" in parentheses behind "server".
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2020-01-07 10:29:49 | Re: glossary |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2020-01-05 11:04:47 | Re: Question to datatype.sgml |