Re:

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2003-02-10 19:49:52
Message-ID: ec013c456c58e9e723370d56b776c627@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>> Wouldn't there need to be an index on OID for your query to be fast?
>>>
>> No, the single index on the "date" field is enough. See the EXPLAIN
>> output from my first post in the original thread:
>>
> However the original poster suggested there would ultimately be 200,000
> or more rows in the table.

Yes, and my EXPLAIN is on a table with 200,000 rows in it. Hence the fact
that it took over 5 seconds - which is still very fast compared to the
original query.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200302101447

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+SAHxvJuQZxSWSsgRAkxTAJ9TnEAjypMGbv8ZRn55yqe/8AZyQgCcCUPm
/dU6kHroxm1XpC0lUrvdY+Y=
=GwmT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

  • Re: at 2003-02-10 19:28:06 from Andrew McMillan

Responses

  • Re: at 2003-02-10 22:46:43 from Scott Morrison

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Morrison 2003-02-10 22:46:43 Re:
Previous Message Andrew McMillan 2003-02-10 19:28:06 Re: