| From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name |
| Date: | 2022-05-11 08:00:56 |
| Message-ID: | eba29ed94f021a74484554b65b1f4655605b2d43.camel@oopsware.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Mittwoch, dem 11.05.2022 um 14:42 +0900 schrieb Michael Paquier:
> Agreed. Nobody is going to remember the difference. REINDEX's
> parsing grammar is designed to be extensible because we have the
> parenthesized flavor. Why don't you add an option there to skip the
> catalogs, like a SKIP_CATALOG?
+1
Having an option is probably the best idea. Though we have REINDEX
SYSTEM, so i throw SKIP_SYSTEM into the ring as an alternative. This
would be consistent with the meaning of both commands/options.
Thanks,
Bernd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2022-05-11 08:08:26 | Re: gitmaster access |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-05-11 07:55:47 | Re: gitmaster access |