From: | "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Where do Tcl questions go? |
Date: | 2006-08-02 17:09:01 |
Message-ID: | eaqm7e$1tji$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes - this statement actually came from a helpful soul who had replied but
did not realise I was talking about pltcl.
I am looking into the "unknown" command because I believe there may be
security issues with using "spource" or "package" commands to access proc
libraries - and that the "unknown" command and its magic tables is the way
to make those libs reside on the server and totally portable. Am I correct?
Carlo
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in message
news:18182(dot)1154537565(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
> "Ian Harding" <iharding(at)destinydata(dot)com> writes:
>> PLTCL was taken out of the core distribution, and is not in contrib.
>
> I think you confused pltcl with pgtcl. Totally different things
> (pltcl is server side, pgtcl client side).
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Maryellen | 2006-08-02 17:13:41 | Fulltime Opportunities in Silicon Valley! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-02 16:56:34 | Re: Where do Tcl questions go? |