Re: Does pg_stat_get_live_tuples() matter?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Sherrylyn Branchaw <sbranchaw(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Does pg_stat_get_live_tuples() matter?
Date: 2019-04-09 21:28:58
Message-ID: ea347682-eb9b-fad5-cf82-4abecf93954d@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 4/9/19 9:45 AM, Sherrylyn Branchaw wrote:
> If a table has 1.8M rows in reality, yet pg_stat_get_live_tuples()
> returns 1.8K, does it matter to the performance of the database, as long
> as pg_class.reltuples is the right order of magnitude?

What version of Postgres?

How are you getting at the 1.8M number?

>
> The query planner seems to use the accurate estimate, but what about the
> autovacuum daemon? Or anything else?
>
> In short, is pg_stat_get_live_tuples() (and the views that invoke it)
> used by any built-in tooling, or is it just there for the user to do
> monitoring?
>
> Thanks,
> Sherrylyn

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sherrylyn Branchaw 2019-04-09 21:56:06 Re: Does pg_stat_get_live_tuples() matter?
Previous Message Sherrylyn Branchaw 2019-04-09 16:45:52 Does pg_stat_get_live_tuples() matter?