Re: I'd like a lightweight alternative to pgAdmin4 ?

pgAdmin 4 is allready at V 2.0

Am 09.10.2017 um 13:13 schrieb Francis Fish:
> Try "upgrading" to version 1.2
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Francis
>
> 07764 225 942
>
> Pharmarketeer is a registered company in England and Wales 06940361,
> registered office 64 Westbank Road, Birkenhead, Merseyside, CH42 7JP
>
> "So when targets seem stupid, arbitrary and unfair it's because they
> /are/. The only way to improve is to look at the whole system people are
> operating with, the basic tools, their training, how much initiative
> they are allowed, are you measuring the right things (more about that
> later) and then you can improve. But it's the /system/ you improve, not
> the people you beat into performing even worse." Unicorns in the mist
> <https://leanpub.com/unicorns>
>
> CV http://www.pharmarketeer.com/francis.html
>
> Lean Teams Consultancy <http://lean-teams.co.uk>
>
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Andreas <maps(dot)on(at)gmx(dot)net
> <mailto:maps(dot)on(at)gmx(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> Hi
> call me oldfashioned but I'd like to have a lightweight alternative
> to pgAdmin4.
>
> pgAdmin3 does in 99% of the time all I have to do with PG, throwing
> SQL at the server and getting some stuff back.
> It starts fast, offers multi-window and drag&drop of scripts into
> the editor.
>
> I really do appreciate all the work put into PG and pgAdmin4
> but pgAdmin4 is more nice to look at than to work with.
>
> pgAdmin3 sadly doesn't like PG 10, so I'm looking in a dead end.
>
> Is there any other tool to talk with PG that doesn't carry so much bulk?
>
>
> Regards
> Andreas
>
>