Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD

From: Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PSA: we lack TAP test coverage on NetBSD and OpenBSD
Date: 2019-01-17 23:46:45
Message-ID: e9b1d113-979a-6a37-ad1d-8148b8fcd81a@mksoft.nu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2019-01-18 00:31, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?Mikael_Kjellstr=c3=b6m?= <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu> writes:
>> And now also the NetBSD machine failed on pgbenchCheck.
>
> Indeed, as expected.

Ok.

>> should I leave it as it is for now?
>
> Please. I'll push a fix for the broken test case in a bit --- I
> just wanted to confirm that somebody else's machines agreed that
> it's broken.

Ok, I will leave it on then.

/Mikael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2019-01-17 23:50:13 Re: draft patch for strtof()
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-01-17 23:38:09 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)