From: | Shinya Kato <Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Ken Kato <katouknl(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Suraj Khamkar <khamkarsuraj(dot)b(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion |
Date: | 2021-10-27 06:54:03 |
Message-ID: | e99b935691e85d6e287ee93384ec19b9@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-10-27 14:45, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 05:04:24PM +0900, Shinya Kato wrote:
>> Barring any objection, I will change status to Ready for Committer.
>
> + else if (Matches("COMMENT", "ON", "PROCEDURAL"))
> + COMPLETE_WITH("LANGUAGE");
> + else if (Matches("COMMENT", "ON", "PROCEDURAL", "LANGUAGE"))
> + COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_languages);
> I don't think that there is much point in being this picky either with
> the usage of PROCEDURAL, as we already complete a similar and simpler
> grammar with LANGUAGE. I would just remove this part of the patch.
In my opinion, it is written in the documentation, so tab-completion of
"PROCEDURAL"is good.
How about a completion with "LANGUAGE" and "PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE", like
"PASSWORD" and "ENCRYPTED PASSWORD" in CREATE ROLE?
> + else if (Matches("COMMENT", "ON", "OPERATOR"))
> + COMPLETE_WITH("CLASS", "FAMILY");
> Isn't this one wrong? Operators can have comments, and we'd miss
> them. This is mentioned upthread, but it seems to me that we'd better
> drop this part of the patch if the operator naming part cannot be
> solved easily.
As you said, it may be misleading.
I agree to drop it.
--
Regards,
--
Shinya Kato
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2021-10-27 06:55:45 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
Previous Message | Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) | 2021-10-27 06:39:46 | RE: Improve logging when using Huge Pages |