| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats |
| Date: | 2022-02-24 09:20:39 |
| Message-ID: | e99316d2-0c85-3092-bd9b-190aa4091dcf@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.02.22 17:17, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-02-21 14:49:01 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>>> * stats_reset (Time at which these statistics were last reset)
>>>>
>>>> The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep,
>>>> pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines.
>>>
>>> pg_stat_subscription_stats :)
>
>> Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let
>> us see what others think. One more option could be
>> pg_stat_subscription_replication.
>
> It was a joke, making light of our bad naming in pg_stat_*, not a serious
> suggestion...
I think pg_stat_subscription_stats is actually the least worst option.
Unless we want to consider renaming pg_stat_subscription (which is
actually more like pg_stat_subscription_activity). But I think that
should be avoided.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Kukushkin | 2022-02-24 09:27:30 | Re: PATCH: add "--config-file=" option to pg_rewind |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-02-24 09:16:52 | Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks |