Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Date: 2025-01-22 18:03:44
Message-ID: e8b6a680-814d-4f0b-9904-51736009980e@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21.01.25 02:06, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> FWIW, after adding ICU support I personally don't think there's a
> pressing need to continue updating the tables anymore.

That appears to ignore what these tables are actually used for. They
are used for Unicode normalization, which is used by SCRAM. So in a
slightly hyperbolic sense, keeping these tables updated is
security-relevant. They are also used by psql to determine character
width and format output correctly.

Building a collation provider on this came much later. It was possibly
a mistake how that was done.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-01-22 18:08:10 Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Previous Message Dmitry Koval 2025-01-22 18:03:05 Re: Invalid index on partitioned table - is this a bug or feature?