From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 |
Date: | 2025-01-22 18:03:44 |
Message-ID: | e8b6a680-814d-4f0b-9904-51736009980e@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.01.25 02:06, Jeremy Schneider wrote:
> FWIW, after adding ICU support I personally don't think there's a
> pressing need to continue updating the tables anymore.
That appears to ignore what these tables are actually used for. They
are used for Unicode normalization, which is used by SCRAM. So in a
slightly hyperbolic sense, keeping these tables updated is
security-relevant. They are also used by psql to determine character
width and format output correctly.
Building a collation provider on this came much later. It was possibly
a mistake how that was done.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-01-22 18:08:10 | Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 |
Previous Message | Dmitry Koval | 2025-01-22 18:03:05 | Re: Invalid index on partitioned table - is this a bug or feature? |