Re: Version Numbering

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version Numbering
Date: 2002-12-13 13:55:54
Message-ID: e88040a2aa63b78f0ae0ba396dbfab4c@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> As we know, most hindrances to OSS adoption are psychological. For that
> reason, do you think that maybe 7.4, if it contains native windows support,
> should be called 8.0?

No. This would never fly. Postgres has a reputation of sensible version
numbering. I think it would have to be something more major to the
underlying codebase than native Windows support before we jumped up
to 8.0.

Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200212130903

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE9+ejevJuQZxSWSsgRAvEaAKDv0OuZsBU8JTftibU0RO11UAIN1ACfcdwV
z3I5ESCM/8ZX94RyugrVDk0=
=f1RM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2002-12-13 14:33:04 Re: Version Numbering
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2002-12-13 03:08:37 Re: Version Numbering