Re: general question on two-partition table

From: David Wilson <david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Janet Jacobsen <jsjacobsen(at)lbl(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: general question on two-partition table
Date: 2009-07-28 00:08:38
Message-ID: e7f9235d0907271708q3176b76cyc178dcb47021604@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Janet Jacobsen<jsjacobsen(at)lbl(dot)gov> wrote:

> Can you suggest other strategies?

Something that might be easier to play with is to create a (or
several, to speed up other queries) functional index on the comparison
between rbscore and the cutoff. It won't buy you anything on seq
scans, but if most of the queries are done on small subsets of the
tuples which meet the "good" criteria, it could be a big win that's
very easy to implement.

--
- David T. Wilson
david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-07-28 00:24:25 Re: general question on two-partition table
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-07-28 00:04:31 Re: For production: 8.4 or 8.3?