From: | "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem returning strings with pgsql 8.3.x |
Date: | 2008-05-13 14:19:42 |
Message-ID: | e7e0a2570805130719t56707b49p8f8641106d5e3aa8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:23:17PM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote:
> >> SPI_push();
> >> retval =
> >> InputFunctionCall(&flinfo, lolVarGetString(returnVal, true),
> >> resultTypeIOParam, -1);
> >> SPI_pop();
>
> > Won't this cause the return value to be allocated inside a new memory
> > block which gets freeds at the SPI_pop?
>
> The SPI_pop in itself is harmless ... the problem is the SPI_finish
> further down, which will release all simple palloc's done within the
> SPI function context. What he needs is something comparable to this bit
> in plpgsql:
>
> /*
> * If the function's return type isn't by value, copy the value
> * into upper executor memory context.
> */
> if (!fcinfo->isnull && !func->fn_retbyval)
> {
> Size len;
> void *tmp;
>
> len = datumGetSize(estate.retval, false, func->fn_rettyplen);
> tmp = SPI_palloc(len);
> memcpy(tmp, DatumGetPointer(estate.retval), len);
> estate.retval = PointerGetDatum(tmp);
> }
>
> ie, push the data into something allocated with SPI_palloc().
I'll give this a shot as soon as I can... many thanks
> I would bet large amounts of money that the problem is not "new in
> 8.3.0", either. Perhaps Josh was not testing in an --enable-cassert
> (CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY) build before.
I'll check... that's definitely not unlikely. Again, thanks.
- Josh
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-13 14:23:48 | Re: DB Connections in TIME_WAIT state |
Previous Message | Jens Wilke | 2008-05-13 14:14:26 | Question on warm standby log shipping |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-05-13 14:21:34 | Re: psql wrapped format default for backslash-d commands |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-13 14:10:16 | Re: Fairly serious bug induced by latest guc enum changes |