Re: Fate of pgsnmpd

From: "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fate of pgsnmpd
Date: 2007-04-07 12:01:10
Message-ID: e7e0a2570704070501p4195acffg1c57cd0a97de8cf4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/6/07, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Yes, it is. There have been a number of commits recently and I believe Josh(?) is giving a talk about it at pgCon.
>
> Regards, Dave

Josh just found his passport, which will make giving that talk a lot
easier ;) As Magnus said, we're aiming at RFC 1697 compliance first.
Since the RFC's MIB is designed to apply to *any* database, it doesn't
cover lots of the specific statistics a pgsql person would likely want
to see, so after the RFC work is done we'll be adding a pgsql-specific
MIB..

- Josh Tolley

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolas Barbier 2007-04-07 12:57:48 Re: Eliminating unnecessary left joins
Previous Message Tzahi Fadida 2007-04-07 10:23:47 Re: Problems with the varlena patch in my module