| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: password_encryption default |
| Date: | 2020-05-22 20:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | e767aacd-c1b9-98d7-8dd8-dccdbf455b4a@postgresfriends.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/22/20 9:09 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> As someone who is an unabashed SCRAM fan and was hoping the default
> would be up'd for v13, I would actually +1 making it the default in v14,
> i.e. because 9.5 will be EOL at that point, and as such we both have
> every* driver supporting SCRAM AND every version of PostgreSQL
> supporting SCRAM.
Wasn't SCRAM introduced in 10?
--
Vik Fearing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-05-22 20:40:17 | Re: xid wraparound danger due to INDEX_CLEANUP false |
| Previous Message | legrand legrand | 2020-05-22 19:27:31 | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |