Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]

From: "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]
Date: 2008-09-08 14:46:56
Message-ID: e739902b0809080746y26745195v54adf34912b224a6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Hello Jaime,

> the same problem happens in joins, unions, hash, etc... so you have to
> look at those functions as well

Great! Added to the list to check. I am planning to build regression tests
for these types to catch these errors in the future. Thanks again for your
testing and review!

> PS: Jaime not Jamie :)

Sorry! I will spell your name correctly from now on!

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-08 14:49:18 Re: hash index improving v3
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-09-08 14:20:15 Re: hash index improving v3