From: | "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types |
Date: | 2008-07-30 07:24:38 |
Message-ID: | e739902b0807300024p35b658f5pd9fd060b15e5a6ad@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah, that's the point of the proposal. I think the issue has come up
> once or twice before, too, else I'd not be so interested in a general
> solution. (digs in archives ... there was some discussion of this
> in connection with unsigned integer types, and I seem to recall older
> threads but can't find any right now.)
Anything I should be looking into and/or testing for unsigned integer support?
Thanks!
- Ryan
P.S. I have most of the uint2 and uint4 types implemented. I am currently
working on the unit and performance testing. I need to upgrade one of
my Linux boxes first before I can complete my testing. I am hoping to post
my code and performance testing later this week.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-07-30 07:45:47 | Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-07-30 06:40:50 | Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql |