From: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in catcaches, |
Date: | 2006-06-15 09:50:26 |
Message-ID: | e6rahf$g0i$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote
>
> Can we do the same for the file descriptors in fd.c?
>
> Very often the total number of file descriptors is much less than the
> maximum, so it would make sense to only maintain the LRU when we are
> using more than 50%-75% of the maximum.
>
I am not against doing it but AFAIR the LRU file operations is (1) not
frequent; (2) the cost is only several CPU circles if we do not run out of
fds; (3) the LRU lseek/close/open big cost is still not avoidable when we
really run out of fds. So this optimization may be not needed. Or do you
have some numbers to show that's a bottleneck for some kind of applications?
Regards,
Qingqing
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-15 14:31:41 | Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in catcaches, |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-06-15 09:23:45 | Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in catcaches, |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2006-06-15 12:10:40 | Re: emu buildfarm failure |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-06-15 09:23:45 | Re: Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in catcaches, |