| From: | Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: slow get_actual_variable_range with long running transactions |
| Date: | 2020-06-16 16:28:01 |
| Message-ID: | e6c34df6-9c15-ad3b-1834-4464080c11b9@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oh, sorry about that, I forgot to detail this. I tested on both 10.13 (which is the production environment on which we faced this), and on 12.3, with the same problem.
On 16/06/2020 17:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Of course, what happens here is that the histogram says that max(a) is 1000000, and get_actual_variable_range verifies the real upper bound. And has to read quite a few dead index records.
>
> We've revised that logic several times to reduce the scope of the
> problem. Since you didn't say which PG version you're using exactly,
> it's hard to offer any concrete suggestions. But I fear there's
> not a lot you can do about it, other than upgrading if you're on a
> pre-v11 release.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc Cousin | 2020-06-16 16:37:17 | Re: slow get_actual_variable_range with long running transactions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-06-16 15:51:22 | Re: slow get_actual_variable_range with long running transactions |