| From: | "Andrus" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why date index is not used |
| Date: | 2006-06-09 09:40:26 |
| Message-ID: | e6bgd4$1vgk$2@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> Actually It looks to me like the sorting is the slow part of this query.
> Maybe if you did create an index on both kuupaev and kellaaeg it might
> make the sorting faster.
Thank you. It makes query fast.
> Or maybe you could try increasing the server's
> work mem. The sort will be much slower if the server can't do the whole
> thing in ram.
I have W2K server with 0.5 GB RAM
there are only 6 connections open ( 6 point of sales) to this server.
shared_buffes is 10000
I see approx 10 postgres processes in task manager each taking about 30 MB
ram
Server prefomance is very slow: Windows swap file size is 1 GB
For each sale a new row will be inserted to this table. So the file size
grows rapidly every day.
Changing work_mem by 1 MB increares memory requirment by 10 MB since I may
have 10 processes running. Sorting in memory this table requires very large
amout of work_mem for each process address space.
I think that if I increase work_mem then swap file will became bigger and
perfomance will decrease even more.
How to increase perfomance ?
Andrus.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrus | 2006-06-09 09:52:21 | Re: Why date index is not used |
| Previous Message | Andrus | 2006-06-09 09:06:47 | Re: Why date index is not used |