From: | Khangelani Gama <kgama(at)argility(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres 9.2.4 - rebuild PostgreSQL using --with-libxml |
Date: | 2014-06-12 10:00:36 |
Message-ID: | e6997e09f33b12a458346f3cd1b87a77@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Was the database server restarted after the new version was built?
> It was not restarted - Should I do so?
Yes, otherwise the old binary will still be running.
Do also take note of Craig Ringer's email on this thread; in particular you
should always run the latest minor version, which is currently 9.2.8.
> Was the database server restarted after the new version was built?
> It was not restarted - Should I do so?
Yes, otherwise the old binary will still be running.
Do also take note of Craig Ringer's email on this thread; in particular you
should always run the latest minor version, which is currently 9.2.8.
Thanks very much, I restarted the database and the problem was fixed. We
will look into using the versions as suggested below
--
Ian Barwick http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The contents of and attachments to this e-mail are intended for the addressee only, and may contain the confidential
information of Argility (Proprietary) Limited and/or its subsidiaries. Any review, use or dissemination thereof by anyone
other than the intended addressee is prohibited.If you are not the intended addressee please notify the writer immediately
and destroy the e-mail. Argility (Proprietary) Limited and its subsidiaries distance themselves from and accept no liability
for unauthorised use of their e-mail facilities or e-mails sent other than strictly for business purposes.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Igor Neyman | 2014-06-12 13:35:36 | Re: what does pg_activity mean when the database is stuck? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-12 09:41:12 | Re: Shared memory changes in 9.4? |