Re: Code of Conduct plan

On 06/05/2018 04:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey(at)proteus-tech(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Not at all. The need for a CoC is not theoretical. Real people,
>>> recently, have left the community due to harassment, and there was no
>>> system within the community to report and deal with that harassment.
>
>> I keep hearing this claim. I've followed up and tried to verify them. Sorry
>> but "trust me" doesn't cut it here any more than "trust me this will make
>> Postgres go faster" would on a code change. What's the context for this?
>
> You want us to name names? I've tried to leave specific peoples' names
> out of this; I don't think it would be helpful to them to dredge up old
> wounds. And I'm quite sure they wouldn't care to be contacted by
> somebody trying to "verify" things.

+1, this is ridiculous.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****