From: | "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Rofail" <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Zhihong Yu" <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Alexander Korotkov" <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andreas Karlsson" <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "David Steele" <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays |
Date: | 2021-01-26 11:50:52 |
Message-ID: | e664a558-0d47-4fe2-b3b5-ce3ec0336d6d@www.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, at 09:14, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> I'll continue testing over the next couple of days and report if I find any more oddities.
I've continued testing by trying to make full use of this feature in the catalog-diff-tool I'm working on.
Today I became aware of a SQL feature that I must confess I've never used before,
that turned out to be useful in my tool, as I then wouldn't need to follow FKs
to do updates manually, but let the database do them automatically.
I'm talking about "ON CASCADE UPDATE", which I see is not supported in the patch.
In my tool, I could simplify the code for normal FKs by using ON CASCADE UPDATE,
but will continue to need my hand-written traverse-FKs-recursively code for Foreign Key Arrays.
I lived a long SQL life without ever needing ON CASCADE UPDATE,
so I would definitively vote for Foreign Key Arrays to be added even without support for this.
Would you say the patch is written in a way which would allow adding support for ON CASCADE UPDATE
later on mostly by adding code, or would it require a major rewrite?
I hesitated if I should share this with you, since I'm really grateful for this feature even without ON CASCADE UPDATE,
but since this was discovered when testing real-life scenario and not some hypothetical example,
I felt it should be noted that I stumbled upon this during testing.
Again, thank you so much for working on this.
/Joel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-01-26 11:54:09 | Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better |
Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-01-26 11:33:06 | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |