From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |
Date: | 2021-08-10 18:05:29 |
Message-ID: | e6574d4423512b254974fb09b19d8d39bd79332b.camel@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I think my point was that committers should be required to understand
> the RMT process, and if we need to communicate that better, let's do
> that. I don't think it should be the responsibility of RMT members
> to
> communicate the RMT process every time they communicate with someone,
> unless someone asks.
Completely agreed, my point was that documenting the process to some
extend would be helpful. For obvious reasons I'm the wrong person to do
that, though. :)
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-08-10 18:07:00 | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-08-10 17:22:20 | Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend |