Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE
Date: 2021-08-10 18:05:29
Message-ID: e6574d4423512b254974fb09b19d8d39bd79332b.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I think my point was that committers should be required to understand
> the RMT process, and if we need to communicate that better, let's do
> that.  I don't think it should be the responsibility of RMT members
> to
> communicate the RMT process every time they communicate with someone,
> unless someone asks.

Completely agreed, my point was that documenting the process to some
extend would be helpful. For obvious reasons I'm the wrong person to do
that, though. :)

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-08-10 18:07:00 Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-08-10 17:22:20 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend