| From: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com (Joshua Drake) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What filesystem? |
| Date: | 2003-02-22 05:25:38 |
| Message-ID: | e60169fc.0302212125.6b4c7f3c@posting.google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
JFS and XFS are the most thoroughly tested. EXT2 is the slowest but
very very stable. ReiserFS is good, EXT3 is good as long as you are
running 2.4.20 + the source EXT3 patches.
Joshua Drake
scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com (Steve Crawford) wrote in message news:<20030221231509(dot)A97CA103BD(at)polaris(dot)pinpointresearch(dot)com>...
> A am about to build another PostgreSQL server on Linux. Has anyone compared=
> =20
> the merits of running PostgreSQL on EXT2, EXT3, JFS, XFS, ReiserFS, etc.?
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-02-22 05:36:48 | Re: HAVING and column alias |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-02-22 05:09:55 | optimizer bent on full table scan |