From: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com (Joshua Drake) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Great Bridge ceases operations |
Date: | 2001-09-15 17:53:43 |
Message-ID: | e60169fc.0109150953.23f6f584@posting.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general |
> Does that leave Red Hat the main (only?) commercial supporter of PostgreSQL?
Heh,
Hardly, there is PGSQL, Inc. and Command Prompt, Inc. (my company). We
have been around for almost four years and have provided custom
development and support for PostgreSQL (starting with Postgres95)
since that time.
There are also several other companies listed on the .org site that
provide support.
You should check out our up-coming book, Practical PostgreSQL:
http://stage.linuxports.com/projects/postgres/book1.htm
J
>
> Not that it really needs expensive support. I'm finding that it just works.
> Maybe THAT was the problem... :-)
>
> Best to all,
> Micah
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2001-09-17 09:09:43 | pgAdmin II v1.1.34 Released |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-10 21:16:37 | Articles from Computerworld |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | peace_flower | 2001-09-15 20:18:23 | NewYork Bombing: SQL server bomb proof!! |
Previous Message | Culley Harrelson | 2001-09-15 14:32:23 | Encoding |