Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Date: 2025-03-21 23:45:08
Message-ID: e600a48f238edb3175ce7856d232ecdc59bc1fe3.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 14:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> And nobody has refuted the argument that refusing to
> update the Unicode tables will cause other problems (such as not
> knowing what to do with new code points that are added in the other
> places where those tables are used).

The argument is irrefutable.
I can only utter my (unproven) conviction that the complaints about
some outlandish character being converted to upper case in the wrong
way won't be as loud as the complaints about a corrupted index.

But perhaps both occurrences would be rare enough that there is
little point in arguing at all.

> People who aren't doing the work
> to improve the infrastructure don't get to hold the longstanding
> process hostage.

Actually, I am arguing for *not* doing the work...

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rustam ALLAKOV 2025-03-21 23:47:10 Re: Patch: Cover POSITION(bytea,bytea) with tests
Previous Message Rustam ALLAKOV 2025-03-21 23:42:16 Re: meson and check-tests