From: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ceriel Jacobs <cerieljacobs(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4731: compile with -fast fails on ld: duplicate symbol _PGP_S2K_TYPE in pgp.o and pgp-mpi-openssl.o |
Date: | 2009-03-25 14:12:23 |
Message-ID: | e51f66da0903250712v389b5152kb4f5b1621f838f9b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 3/25/09, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Ceriel Jacobs" <cerieljacobs(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > ld: duplicate symbol _PGP_S2K_TYPE in pgp.o and pgp-mpi-openssl.o
>
> I think at bottom that's a compiler/linker bug which you should mention
> to Apple. However, I see what is causing it: pgp.h contains
>
> enum
> {
> PGP_S2K_SIMPLE = 0,
> PGP_S2K_SALTED = 1,
> PGP_S2K_ISALTED = 3
> } PGP_S2K_TYPE;
>
> I think what was meant was
>
> enum PGP_S2K_TYPE
> {
> PGP_S2K_SIMPLE = 0,
> PGP_S2K_SALTED = 1,
> PGP_S2K_ISALTED = 3
> };
>
> because what the first one is doing is defining a global variable
> that is of an anonymous enum type.
Eh, it's silly mistake indeed.
> Marko, am I right that this is just a syntax mistake, and not
> intentional creation of a variable? There are several occurrences
> of the pattern in pgp.h.
Yes, it's syntax bug. Should I send patch?
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-03-25 14:15:48 | Re: BUG #4730: Vacuum full verbose analyze "deadlock" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-25 13:58:24 | Re: BUG #4731: compile with -fast fails on ld: duplicate symbol _PGP_S2K_TYPE in pgp.o and pgp-mpi-openssl.o |