Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS

From: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Date: 2009-02-09 12:47:21
Message-ID: e51f66da0902090447m6ed55817re93fe2102daa8dc9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/9/09, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:51:22AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Now, if you want to argue that we should get rid of SET WITHOUT OIDS
> > > altogether,
> >
> > +1 for removing it altogether. Row OIDs are and ugly wart :P
>
> That might be true but I know of apps that use them. Having the ability to
> migrate those slowly by using SET WITHOUT OIDS is a Good Thing (tm).

+1 for removal.

Also, whether the removal happens or not, I would suggest a setting that
makes Postgres accept, but ignore default_with_oids / WITH OIDS settings.

The problem is how to migrate apps that definitely do not use oids,
in a situation where you have hundred of databases.

Scanning all dbs and doing ALTER table would be option, if it would
work 100% and would not touch data. Otherwise is cannot be used.

Trying to manually manipulate dump files which are filled with
"SET default_with_oids" each time database is dumped/reloaded is also
not an option.

Currently the only sane path seems to patch Postgres to ignore the
settings, but that does not seem very user-friendly approach...

--
marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Lee Lambert 2009-02-09 12:48:22 Re: UUIDs using e2fs library on Linux in 8.4
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT 2009-02-09 10:32:13 RE: [HACKERS] 64 bit PostgreSQL 8.3.6 build on AIX 5300-09-02-0849 with IBM XL C/C++ 10.1.0.1 - initdb fails (could not dump unrecognized node type: 650)