Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-24 09:20:45
Message-ID: e51f66da0807240220g70381060h7293b7aacbdb0569@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/24/08, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Am Wednesday, 23. July 2008 schrieb Marko Kreen:
> > And the idea to turn pgfoundry into CPAN
> > is pointless. An user may willing to throw random modules to his
> > random perl script, but not to his whole db architecture.
>
> Based on what reasoning?

Based on my own behaviour.

--
marko

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-24 09:52:11 Additional psql requirements
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-24 08:56:49 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance