Re: Feature request: NOTIFY enhancement

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature request: NOTIFY enhancement
Date: 2008-01-04 08:35:38
Message-ID: e51f66da0801040035m4ce3b048se41d56bac51c7555@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/3/08, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
> bruce(at)momjian(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> >> I am not sure if I am asking too much but does it make sense, and is it
> >> possible, to enhance NOTIFY that process "name/value" pair? Like this:
> >>
> >> NOTIFY "MyName=MyValue";
> >>
> >> With the capability of name/value pair, the listener will not have to
> >> check notification details by reading tables.
> >
> > TODO already has:
> >
> > * Add optional textual message to NOTIFY
> >
> > This would allow an informational message to be added to the notify
> > message, perhaps indicating the row modified or other custom
> > information.
>
> I keep wondering if this isn't just going to grow into pgq...
>
> <http://docs.huihoo.com/api/skytools/pgq-module.html>
>
> In effect, once you start defining more semantics for this, I think it
> rapidly transforms into a message queueing system, and you might as
> well go straight to something full-fledged like pgq...

Sligtly better link for PgQ:
https://developer.skype.com/SkypeGarage/DbProjects/SkyTools#head-65d9b2775e38524d7ce3f3940700cdf924480bc6

--
marko

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2008-01-04 08:38:35 implicit vs. explicit RETURN when OUT is used
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2008-01-04 08:20:27 Re: Can't make backup