From: | "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Gevik Babakhani" <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [DOCS] uuid type not documented |
Date: | 2007-04-11 06:46:51 |
Message-ID: | e51f66da0704102346i53064150o4c0f0108288fbacd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 4/10/07, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> The problem is that most of the standard methods are platform dependent, as
> they require MAC addresses or a "good" random source, for instance.
FYI: good random source is already available in pgcrypto,
it uses either OpenSSL RAND_bytes() or internal strong PRNG.
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2007-04-11 12:07:55 | Re: uuid type not documented |
Previous Message | Roman Neuhauser | 2007-04-11 05:28:17 | Re: [DOCS] uuid type not documented |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-11 06:52:41 | Re: [HACKERS] CIC and deadlocks |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-11 06:38:09 | Re: Question about SHM_QUEUE |