From: | "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 |
Date: | 2006-10-22 20:25:49 |
Message-ID: | e51f66da0610221325hb3413a0w5361d6ca743e791e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/22/06, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:10:56PM +0530, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Michael Kounavis has given a green signal (please refer the forwarded
> > message).
>
> I don't think that helps. The publishing date of this article was March
> 2006. If this is really the first time this algorithm was published, that
> means that anyone else (or even the author) has the option of patenting
> this algorithm sometime before March 2007 and still claiming they
> invented it first.
>
> And realistically we would wait at least a year or three after that,
> because you don't get to see patents as they're applied for.
>
> Maybe March 2010 we can look into it...
Consudering the author has OK-d it and given how easy
is to replace the algorithm, I don't see the reason for
such carefulness?
--
marko
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-10-22 21:39:12 | Re: xlogdump fixups and WAL log question. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-22 17:52:34 | Re: pg_buffercache tidyup |