Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call

From: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
Date: 2017-07-18 19:35:43
Message-ID: e4e43869-64ce-2bb7-6505-1c35077cf680@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18/07/2017 14:04, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-07-17 23:04:43 +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> Is it v11 material or is there any chance to make it in v10?
>
> I think it'd make sense to apply the first to v10 (and earlier), and the
> second to v11. I think this isn't a terribly risky patch, but it's
> still a relatively large change for this point in the development
> cycle. I'm willing to reconsider, but that's my default.

Agreed.

--
Julien Rouhaud

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-07-18 19:45:53 Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-07-18 18:44:01 Re: More race conditions in logical replication